🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding the comments delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's win over the American player during the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and sports often encourage nationalism. Some disappointment was understandable. Instead, he invoked the continued drought of American men at the majors: none of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven grand slams (and Alcaraz went on to thrash a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked the German with growing comfort. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. His top-class delivery and powerful power on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often helpless. The past few years has seen the curious rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the surprising quickness and grace of much shorter men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has made a number of dramatic, improbable advancements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and held the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of American men winning major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

The American star achieved a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of frustration. When Fritz eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend excessive energy to prevail. Facing set points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and never particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only express his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it forever if I fail to do it,” Fritz told a journalist in the summer of claiming a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {