🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is in order – Black History is Now Month.